Guide ยท Guide

How Do Small Manufacturers Use AI to Check Warranty Claims Against Written Terms Before a Person Decides?

Key takeaways

  • Every warranty claim decision must be made by a named person: the AI agent checks the claim against the written terms and lists what is missing or outside scope, but it never approves or denies. This is the specific obligation imposed by the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.).
  • Storing the warranty terms in an Information node on the workflow canvas means the agent always checks against the same written text, not a paraphrase or a remembered version. When terms change, update the node and save a new workflow version.
  • The FTC's implementing regulation at 16 CFR Part 701 specifies five required disclosures in a written consumer product warranty: what is covered, what is excluded, what the warrantor will do, when the warranty period begins and ends, and how the consumer can obtain service. The agent's system prompt should check the claim against each of these five elements.
  • The Human Review node in Dave by voolama records the reviewer's name, their decision (Approve, Reject, or Request Changes), an optional comment, and a timestamp, creating an immutable audit trail for every claim. These records support SOC 2 CC6.1 and GDPR Article 30 when those compliance modes are enabled.
  • Set the agent's temperature to 0.1 in the Config JSON. Warranty checking is a deterministic task: you want the same claim to produce the same checklist every time. A temperature of 0.0 is fully deterministic; 1.0 is most varied.

Summary

This guide covers what is specific to warranty claims that general approval-workflow guides do not: the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) creates a legal obligation to honor written warranty terms as written, and the FTC's implementing regulation at 16 CFR Part 701 specifies exactly what those terms must disclose. It builds a five-node workflow in Dave by voolama (hellodave.ai) where the customer submits claim details through a User Interaction step, an AI agent checks the claim against the exact written warranty terms stored in an Information node and lists what is missing or outside the terms, and a named reviewer decides every claim at a Human Review step. The AI never approves or denies. The refund-request approval guide at hellodave.ai/guide/refund-request-approval-workflow covers the general pattern; this guide extends it with the five specific 16 CFR Part 701 warranty disclosures, the agent temperature setting for deterministic output, and the version-history record of which warranty terms were in effect for each claim.

The steps

  1. Write your warranty terms as a specific, dated document aligned with 16 CFR Part 701

    Before building any workflow, your written warranty terms must exist as a specific, dated document. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) requires that written warranties on consumer products be made available to buyers before purchase and honored as written. The FTC's implementing regulation at 16 CFR Part 701 specifies five required disclosures for written consumer product warranties:

    1. What is covered (the defects or malfunctions the warranty applies to)
    2. What is excluded (what the warranty does not cover)
    3. What the warrantor will do to correct a defect (repair, replace, or refund)
    4. When the warranty period begins and ends
    5. How the consumer can obtain warranty service (the address or contact method)

    If your warranty terms exist only in someone's head or in a loosely worded email template, the AI agent cannot check claims against them reliably. The agent compares submitted claim details against the exact text you provide. Vague text produces vague output. The general approval-workflow pattern, where a manager must approve before any action goes out, is covered at How Do I Build a Refund Request Workflow in Dave by voolama Where a Manager Must Approve Every Refund? This guide extends that pattern with the five specific 16 CFR Part 701 elements the agent must check. A warranty check is different from a conflict check (covered at Conflict Checks at Law Office Intake) in that the agent evaluates a claim against five statutory disclosure elements rather than searching for name matches in a list.

    Do this
    • Write the warranty terms as a plain-text document. Use the five required disclosures from 16 CFR Part 701 as your checklist: coverage, exclusions, remedy, duration, and how to obtain service.
    • Date the document and give it a version number, for example: 'Warranty Terms v1, effective 2026-01-01.'
    • Save the document somewhere your team can find it. You will paste the full text into the workflow's Information node in Step 4.
    • If you have multiple product lines with different warranty terms, create a separate document for each. You can build a Routing node in the workflow to branch on product line before the agent runs.
    Example

    A hypothetical small appliance manufacturer might write: 'This warranty covers defects in materials and workmanship for 12 months from the date of original purchase by the end user. It does not cover damage from misuse, accidents, unauthorized modifications, or normal wear and tear. Proof of purchase is required for all warranty claims. To obtain warranty service, contact us at [address] within the warranty period. We will repair or replace the defective product at our option.' That covers all five 16 CFR Part 701 elements. An agent can compare a submitted claim against each element and report which are satisfied, which are not, and which cannot be determined from the information provided.

    Best practice
    • Keep the warranty terms in plain English. Legal language that is ambiguous to a human is also ambiguous to an AI agent.
    • List exclusions explicitly rather than using catch-all phrases. 'Damage from misuse' is harder to check than 'damage from use outside the conditions described in the product manual.'
    • Review and update the terms document whenever you change your warranty policy, and update the workflow's Information node at the same time. Save a new workflow version so the previous version's terms remain on record.
  2. Set up your Dave by voolama workspace and assign roles

    Dave by voolama (hellodave.ai) is a managed AI workflow platform operated and hosted by voolama LLC. You run no servers and install nothing. To build the warranty claim workflow, you need at least one user with the Admin or Curate role to open the Workflow Editor, and at least one user with the Admin or Use role to complete the Human Review tasks the workflow generates.

    Dave by voolama has six default roles: Admin, Create, Curate, Use, Reporting, and Financial. All six are editable. The Workflow Editor is accessible only to users with the Admin or Curate role. The Task Inbox, where reviewers see and decide warranty claims, is accessible only to users with the Admin or Use role. If a team member cannot see the Workflow Editor or the Task Inbox, their role assignment is the first thing to check. The resource at Why Can't I See Agents, Workflows, or Other Sections in Dave by voolama? explains the role-to-section mapping in detail.

    You also need at least one AI provider configured under Admin, then API Management, then Providers. Dave by voolama supports seven AI provider types: OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, Google, OpenAI-compatible, local (Ollama), and custom. You bring your own API key. Dave by voolama never proxies or marks up AI usage.

    Do this
    • Log in to Dave by voolama and navigate to Admin, then Settings, then Users and Roles.
    • Assign the Curate role to the person who will build the workflow, or use an Admin account.
    • Assign the Use role to the person or people who will review and decide warranty claims in the Task Inbox.
    • Confirm that at least one AI provider is configured under Admin, API Management, Providers. The Agent Interaction node in Step 4 needs an active provider to run.
    Example

    A hypothetical small manufacturer with three office staff might assign Admin to the owner, Curate to the office manager who will build the workflow, and Use to the customer service representative who will review claims in the Task Inbox. The owner can also complete tasks as an Admin. No IT staff are needed.

    Best practice
    • Do not give the Use role to people who also need to edit workflows or agents. Keep the roles separate so the reviewer's Task Inbox is not cluttered with builder tools.
    • Configure at least one AI provider before building the workflow. The Agent Interaction node will not run without one.
  3. Create the warranty terms checker agent with temperature 0.1

    In Dave by voolama, an agent is a reusable AI component with a versioned configuration: a system prompt, a model, and behavior parameters. Navigate to Agents in the sidebar to create the warranty claim checker agent. Users with the Admin or Create role can create agents; the Curate role can view but not create them.

    The agent's system prompt instructs the AI to read the warranty terms provided, read the claim details submitted by the customer, and produce a structured checklist that lists each of the five 16 CFR Part 701 warranty elements, whether the submitted claim satisfies each one (yes, no, or cannot determine from information provided), and what specific information is missing or outside the terms.

    The key Config JSON parameter for this agent is temperature. Temperature controls output randomness: 0.0 is fully deterministic, 1.0 is most varied. Set temperature to 0.1 for a warranty checker. Warranty checking is a deterministic task: you want the same claim to produce the same checklist every time. A temperature above 0.3 introduces variation that may cause the agent to omit conditions or vary its output format between runs of the same claim.

    Do this
    • Navigate to Agents in the sidebar and click New Agent.
    • Name the agent 'Warranty Claim Checker' and add an optional description. Click Create Agent.
    • On the agent detail page, click Create Version. In the Config JSON editor, paste a JSON object with at minimum: systemPrompt, model, temperature (set to 0.1), and maxTokens. Example: {"systemPrompt": "You are a warranty claim checker for a small manufacturer. You will be given the written warranty terms and a customer's submitted claim. For each of the five warranty elements required by 16 CFR Part 701 (coverage, exclusions, remedy, duration, how to obtain service), state whether the claim satisfies it: yes, no, or cannot determine from information provided. List any required information that is missing from the claim. Do not approve or deny the claim. Your output is a numbered checklist for a human reviewer.", "model": "gpt-4o", "temperature": 0.1, "maxTokens": 1024}
    • Click Create Version. The system assigns version number v1 automatically. Version numbers are auto-incrementing integers (v1, v2, v3). Each version is immutable once created.
    Example

    A hypothetical manufacturer with a 12-month defect warranty might write a system prompt that lists the five 16 CFR Part 701 elements as numbered items and instructs the agent to evaluate the claim against each one. When the agent runs, its output is a five-item checklist. The human reviewer sees a structured checklist rather than a free-form AI summary, making the review faster and the decision more defensible if the customer disputes it.

    Best practice
    • Keep the system prompt specific about the output format. If you want a numbered checklist, say so. If you want the agent to flag missing fields by name, say so.
    • Do not instruct the agent to make a recommendation about whether to approve or deny. The agent's job is to check, not to decide.
    • If you need to change the system prompt later, create a new version rather than editing v1. Old versions are immutable and remain in the version history, giving you a record of what instructions were active for each claim.
  4. Build the workflow canvas in the Workflow Editor

    Navigate to Workflows in the sidebar and create a new workflow named 'Warranty Claim Intake.' Open it in the Workflow Editor. The editor uses a three-panel layout: the Node Palette on the left lists all ten node types, the Canvas in the center is where you place and connect nodes, and the Properties Panel on the right appears when you select a node.

    The warranty claim workflow uses five node types in sequence. Drag each node from the Node Palette onto the canvas and connect them by dragging from the source handle (bottom circle) of one node to the target handle (top circle) of the next. The connection direction is always source (bottom) to target (top).

    The five nodes and their codes from the Node Palette:

    • Start (code: start, green icon): entry point. Every workflow requires exactly one Start node.
    • User Interaction (code: user_interaction, blue icon): pauses the workflow and creates an intake task in the Task Inbox. Configure its fields to collect product name, model number, purchase date, defect description, and supporting documentation.
    • Information (code: information, indigo icon): documentation node, does not affect execution. Paste the full text of your written warranty terms into the node's config. The Agent Interaction node references this text in its system prompt. This is the same Information node pattern used in the RFP response workflow at Building an RFP Response Workflow in Dave by voolama, where approved answers are stored in an Information node for the drafting agent to reference.
    • Agent Interaction (code: agent_interaction, purple icon): invokes the Warranty Claim Checker agent. In the Properties Panel, open Agent Assignment and select the Warranty Claim Checker agent, version v1.
    • Human Review (code: human_review, amber icon): creates a review task in the Task Inbox. The reviewer sees the agent's checklist in the task Payload section and clicks Approve, Reject, or Request Changes. Assign it to the reviewer's user account or the Use role in the Properties Panel.

    Add an End node (code: end, red icon) after the Human Review node. Optionally, add a Routing node (code: routing, purple icon) between the User Interaction and Agent Interaction nodes to check whether required fields are populated before the agent runs.

    Do this
    • Navigate to Workflows in the sidebar. Click New Workflow. Name it 'Warranty Claim Intake.' Open the Workflow Editor.
    • Drag a Start node onto the canvas.
    • Drag a User Interaction node below it. Connect Start to User Interaction. Rename it 'Collect Claim Details' in the Properties Panel.
    • Drag an Information node below that. Connect User Interaction to Information. Rename it 'Warranty Terms.' Paste the full text of your warranty terms into the node config.
    • Drag an Agent Interaction node below that. Connect Information to Agent Interaction. Rename it 'Check Claim Against Terms.' In the Properties Panel, open Agent Assignment and select the Warranty Claim Checker agent, version v1.
    • Drag a Human Review node below that. Connect Agent Interaction to Human Review. Rename it 'Reviewer Decision.' Assign it to the reviewer's user account or the Use role.
    • Drag an End node and connect it. Click Save Version in the top-right corner.
    Example

    A hypothetical manufacturer builds a canvas with seven nodes: Start, Collect Claim Details (User Interaction), Warranty Terms (Information), Check Claim Against Terms (Agent Interaction), Reviewer Decision (Human Review), and two End nodes labeled 'Claim Resolved' and 'Claim Returned.' A Routing node between User Interaction and Agent Interaction checks whether the purchase date field is populated. If it is missing, the workflow routes to a second User Interaction node that asks the customer to provide proof of purchase before the agent runs.

    Best practice
    • Name every node descriptively in the Properties Panel. 'Human Review' as a label tells a future editor nothing. 'Reviewer Decision - Warranty Claim' tells them exactly what the node does.
    • Save frequently. Each save creates a new immutable version. The Workflow Editor does not auto-save.
    • Ensure all paths lead to an End node. A node with no outgoing edge and no End node will cause the workflow instance to hang at runtime.
  5. Activate the workflow and process the first claim

    Once the workflow is saved, move it from Draft to Active status. Only an active workflow can accept new instances. Navigate to the Workflows list, open your warranty claim workflow, and change its status to Active.

    When a customer submits a warranty claim, start a new instance of the workflow. The instance pauses at the User Interaction node and creates a task in the Task Inbox. The customer or a staff member fills in the claim details and clicks Approve to submit. The workflow then passes the claim details and the warranty terms to the Agent Interaction node, which runs the Warranty Claim Checker agent. The agent produces a five-element checklist aligned with 16 CFR Part 701 and the workflow pauses again at the Human Review node, creating a new task in the Task Inbox for the assigned reviewer.

    The reviewer opens the task, reads the agent's checklist in the Payload section, and clicks Approve, Reject, or Request Changes. They can add a comment explaining their reasoning. Every decision is recorded in the audit trail with the reviewer's name and a timestamp. These records support SOC 2 CC6.1 (logical access) and GDPR Article 30 (records of processing activities) when those compliance modes are enabled in the Dave by voolama workspace.

    Do this
    • Navigate to Workflows, open the warranty claim workflow, and set its status to Active.
    • Start a new instance for the first test claim. Use a hypothetical claim with known details so you can verify the agent's output.
    • Navigate to Tasks in the sidebar to open the Task Inbox. The User Interaction task appears with a pending status (amber badge).
    • Complete the User Interaction task by filling in the claim details and clicking Approve.
    • Wait for the Agent Interaction node to run automatically. When it completes, the Human Review task appears in the Task Inbox with a pending status.
    • Open the Human Review task and read the Payload section. The agent's checklist lists each of the five 16 CFR Part 701 warranty elements and its status for this claim.
    • Click Approve, Reject, or Request Changes. Add a comment explaining the decision.
    • Confirm the workflow reaches an End node and the instance status shows completed.
    Example

    A hypothetical reviewer opens a Human Review task and sees the agent's five-element checklist: '1. Coverage (product covered by warranty): Yes. 2. Exclusions (no excluded conditions present): Cannot determine - customer states product was used as directed but no additional detail provided. 3. Remedy (repair or replacement applicable): Yes. 4. Duration (within 12-month warranty period): Cannot determine - purchase date submitted is 2025-10-01 but no proof of purchase was attached. 5. How to obtain service (claim submitted to correct contact): Yes. Missing information: proof of purchase document.' The reviewer clicks Request Changes and adds a comment: 'Please provide proof of purchase before we can proceed.'

    Best practice
    • For the first several claims, have the reviewer compare the agent's checklist against the warranty terms manually to verify the agent is checking correctly. If the agent misses a condition or misreads the terms, update the system prompt and create a new agent version (v2).
    • Use the comment field on every decision, not just rejections. A brief note on an approval creates a useful record if the customer disputes the decision later.
    • The Task Inbox is available to Admin and Use roles only. If a reviewer cannot see their tasks, check their role assignment using the guidance at Why Can't I See Agents, Workflows, or Other Sections in Dave by voolama?

What makes warranty claim decisions legally different from general approval decisions

Dave by voolama (hellodave.ai) is a managed AI workflow platform where voolama LLC operates and hosts everything. You run no servers and install nothing. The warranty claim workflow described in this guide uses five of the ten node types available on the workflow canvas: Start, User Interaction, Information, Agent Interaction, and Human Review.

The general pattern of structured intake, AI review, and human approval is covered at How Do I Build a Refund Request Workflow in Dave by voolama Where a Manager Must Approve Every Refund? This guide extends that pattern with what is specific to warranty claims. A refund policy is a business rule the owner can change. A written warranty is a legal commitment that must be honored as stated. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) requires that written warranties on consumer products be made available before purchase and honored as written. The FTC's implementing regulation at 16 CFR Part 701 specifies five required disclosures: what is covered, what is excluded, what the warrantor will do, when the warranty period begins and ends, and how the consumer can obtain service.

This guide is different from the conflict-check guide at Conflict Checks at Law Office Intake in a specific way. A conflict check uses an agent to search for name matches in a client list: the agent is looking for overlap between two sets of names. A warranty check uses an agent to evaluate a submitted claim against five statutory disclosure elements defined in 16 CFR Part 701: the agent is assessing whether the claim satisfies each element, not searching for matches. The node sequence is similar; the agent's task, the reference data, and the legal obligation are different. For warranty claims, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act creates a statutory obligation to honor the exact written terms, which is why the Information node holds the verbatim warranty text rather than a list.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act applies to written warranties on consumer products sold to individuals for personal, family, or household use. It does not cover commercial or B2B transactions. For small manufacturers who sell both consumer and commercial products, the workflow can be adapted with a Routing node that branches on customer type before the agent runs.

The five node types this workflow uses and what each one does

Dave by voolama has ten workflow node types. The warranty claim intake workflow uses five of them. Here is what each one does in this specific context, with the code value and icon color from the Workflow Editor's Node Palette:

  • Start (code: start, green icon). The entry point. Every workflow has exactly one Start node. Execution begins here when a new claim instance is started.
  • User Interaction (code: user_interaction, blue icon). Pauses the workflow and creates a task in the Task Inbox. In this workflow, the User Interaction node is the intake form: it collects the product name, model number, purchase date, defect description, and any supporting documentation. The workflow does not advance until the task is completed and the submitter clicks Approve.
  • Information (code: information, indigo icon). A documentation node that does not affect execution. In this workflow, the Information node holds the full text of the written warranty terms, structured around the five 16 CFR Part 701 elements. When you update your warranty terms, you update this node and save a new workflow version. The previous version remains available as an immutable snapshot, so you have a record of which terms were in effect for each claim.
  • Agent Interaction (code: agent_interaction, purple icon). Invokes the Warranty Claim Checker agent automatically. The agent reads the claim details from the User Interaction step and the warranty terms from the Information node, then produces a five-element checklist aligned with 16 CFR Part 701. The agent never approves or denies the claim. Temperature is set to 0.1 in the Config JSON to ensure deterministic output.
  • Human Review (code: human_review, amber icon). Creates a review task in the Task Inbox for the assigned reviewer. The reviewer sees the agent's checklist in the task Payload section and clicks Approve, Reject, or Request Changes. Every decision is recorded with the reviewer's name and a timestamp, supporting SOC 2 CC6.1 and GDPR Article 30 when those compliance modes are enabled.

Where this advice stops

This is not legal advice. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) and the FTC's implementing regulations at 16 CFR Part 701 are cited here as the primary federal framework for written consumer product warranties. Warranty law also varies by state: some states have implied warranty rules that apply regardless of what a written warranty says, and some states have specific requirements for warranty dispute resolution. Consult a licensed attorney before relying on any specific warranty process for legal protection.

  • This guide covers consumer product warranties only. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act applies to written warranties on consumer products sold to individuals for personal, family, or household use. Commercial and B2B warranty obligations are governed by contract terms and the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in each state, not by Magnuson-Moss.
  • This guide does not cover implied warranties. Even if a product has no written warranty, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose may apply under state law. A workflow that checks against written terms does not address implied warranty claims.
  • The AI agent's checklist is not a legal determination. The agent checks the submitted claim details against the written warranty text. It does not verify facts, authenticate documents, or make legal judgments. The human reviewer makes every decision.
  • This guide does not cover dispute resolution. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act has specific requirements for informal dispute resolution mechanisms in some circumstances. Consult an attorney for guidance.

Frequently asked questions

Can the AI agent approve or deny a warranty claim automatically?

No. In this workflow, the AI agent checks the claim against the written warranty terms and produces a checklist of what is covered, what is missing, and what falls outside the terms. Every approve-or-deny decision is made by a named person at the Human Review step. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) requires that warranty obligations be honored as written. A refund policy is a business rule the owner can change; a written warranty is a legal commitment that must be honored as stated, which is why human review is non-optional here.

What are the five required disclosures in a written consumer product warranty under 16 CFR Part 701?

The FTC's regulation at 16 CFR Part 701 requires that written warranties on consumer products disclose: (1) what is covered, (2) what is excluded, (3) what the warrantor will do to correct a defect (repair, replace, or refund), (4) when the warranty period begins and ends, and (5) how the consumer can obtain warranty service. The agent's system prompt should instruct it to check the submitted claim against each of these five elements and report whether the claim satisfies each one.

Where do I store the warranty terms so the agent checks against them?

In Dave by voolama (hellodave.ai), use an Information node (code: information, indigo icon) on the workflow canvas. The Information node does not affect workflow execution: it is a documentation node that the agent references in its system prompt. Paste the full warranty text into the node's label or config. When you update your warranty terms, update the Information node and save a new workflow version. The previous version remains available as an immutable snapshot, so you have a record of which terms were in effect for each claim.

Who can see and complete the Human Review task?

In Dave by voolama, the Task Inbox is visible to users with the Admin or Use role. Users with Create, Curate, Reporting, or Financial roles cannot access the Task Inbox. The reviewer clicks Approve, Reject, or Request Changes, and can add a comment explaining the decision. Every decision is recorded in the audit trail with the acting user's name and a timestamp, supporting SOC 2 CC6.1 (logical access) and GDPR Article 30 (records of processing activities) when those compliance modes are enabled.

Does this workflow cover commercial or B2B warranty claims?

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) applies to written warranties on consumer products sold to individuals for personal, family, or household use. It does not cover commercial or B2B transactions. If your warranty claims involve commercial buyers, the applicable rules depend on your contract terms and the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in your state. Consult a licensed attorney before relying on any specific process for legal protection.

Sources

  1. Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq. (FTC legal library)
  2. 16 CFR Part 701: Disclosure of Written Consumer Product Warranty Terms and Conditions (eCFR)
  3. Why Can't I See Agents, Workflows, or Other Sections in Dave by voolama? (hellodave.ai)
  4. Building an RFP Response Workflow in Dave by voolama: Drafting, Agent Review, and Owner Approval (hellodave.ai)
  5. Conflict Checks at Law Office Intake: Structuring the AI Search and Attorney Decision Gate (hellodave.ai)

Last reviewed